Home > Part One Table of Contents > Part Two Propositions Table of Contents > Part Three, Judges on the Ballot, Judicial Performance Review
Skip to any navigation link on this page to learn more about a judge's review. Judges are separated on ballots by county.
Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review (JPR)
JUDGES TABLE OF CONTENTS
Skip to Who Judges the Judges (about this section)
Statewide Arizona Supreme Court and Courts of Appeal
Skip to Judges Summary - Appellate Courts
Skip to Judges Details - Appellate Courts
Trial Courts by County
Pinal County
Skip to Judges Summary - Pinal County Superior Court
Skip to Judges Details - Pinal County Superior Court
Pima County
Skip to Judges Summary - Pima County Superior Court
Skip to Judges Details - Pima County Superior Court
Maricopa County
Skip to Judges Summary - Maricopa County Superior Court
Skip to Judges Details - Maricopa County Superior Court
Do not want to listen to this section? Skip back to Main Menu for this Guide
JPR Voter Checklist
WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES? YOU DO! WE CAN HELP.
Voters! Finish the Ballot!
Use the following summary and report by the Commission on Judicial Performance Review (JPR) to Finish the Ballot! The JPR Commission was established by voters to evaluate judges’ performance during retention elections. While judges initially are appointed, this report can help you decide whether these judges meet judicial performance standards and should be retained. Which judges appear on your ballot depends on your county and the court on which the judge serves. By using this report to finish your ballot, you will help ensure Arizona’s strong and impartial judiciary!
Some Arizona judges are appointed through Merit Selection and rated by the JPR Commission.
Merit Selection and Retention
In 1974, Arizona voters decided that for Arizona’s Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and Superior Courts in counties with populations over 250,000 (currently Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal) judges would be appointed by the Governor from a list of qualified candidates. The Arizona Constitution directs commissions to nominate candidates based primarily on their merit, with consideration given to the diversity of Arizona’s population. Arizona voters then periodically vote whether to retain these judges as their terms expire. This system is known as Merit Selection and Retention.
JPR Commission Evaluations & Report
Created by a constitutional amendment, the 30-member JPR Commission conducts standards-based performance evaluations of judges. Most of the JPR Commissioners are public members, not lawyers or judges. JPR reports its results to the public. This report provides JPR Commission findings, survey results, and states whether each judge in a retention election “meets” or “fails to meet” judicial performance standards.
Judicial Performance Standards
The JPR Commission evaluates each judge up for retention election to assess the judge’s:
Legal Ability: Decides cases based on applicable law, demonstrating competent legal analysis.
Integrity: Free from personal bias. Administers justice fairly, ethically, and uniformly.
Communication Skills: Issues prompt and understandable rulings and directions.
Judicial Temperament: Dignified, courteous, and patient.
Administrative Performance: Manages courtroom and office effectively. Issues rulings promptly and efficiently.
Public Input Throughout the Process
This year, as every election year, the JPR Commission sought public input from citizens who have had direct experience with judges and made its decisions using that input. In 2013, 60,000 surveys on judges were distributed to attorneys, jurors, litigants and witnesses. The JPR Commission held public hearings open to anyone wishing to speak about the judges up for retention this year. The JPR Commission accepts signed, written comments about merit-appointed judges at any time.
Use JPR Results and Checklist
Every Voter can take an active role in this judicial review process. Use this JPR summary and report to guide your votes for judges up for retention. After reviewing a judge’s information, mark “Yes” or “No” next to the judge’s name on the Judges Checklist tear-off sheet in this pamphlet. Refer to your checklist to Finish Your Ballot!
Contact the Commission on Judicial Performance Review: Visit www.AZJudges.info for more information. (602) 452-3311 or email [email protected]
Reading This Data
Judicial Performance Commission Results indicate how JPR Commissioners voted, whether a judge “MEETS” Judicial Performance Standards based on survey information as well as all other information submitted by the public or the judge. Judicial Performance Surveys percentages show results of surveys completed by respondents based on the averaged results of the survey respondents who rated the judge “satisfactory” or better in combined Judicial Performance Standards categories.
Judicial Performance Standards include:
Legal Ability: Decides cases based on applicable law, demonstrating competent legal analysis.
Integrity: Free from personal bias. Administers justice fairly, ethically, and uniformly.
Communication Skills: Issues prompt and understandable rulings and directions.
Judicial Temperament: Dignified, courteous, and patient.
Administrative Performance: Manages courtroom and office effectively. Issues rulings promptly and efficiently.
JUDGES - SUMMARY - APPELLATE COURTS
RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THE APPELLATE COURT JUSTICES AND JUDGES |
The following judges DO NOT MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
NONE |
The following judges MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
ARIZONA SUPREME COURT:
Scott Bales
Robert Brutinel |
COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE:
Andrew W. Gould
Randall M. Howe
Diane M. Johnsen
Patricia A. Orozco
Samuel A. Thumma
COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO:
Garye L. Vasquez |
Judge |
JPR Votes “Meets” Judicial Standards |
JPR Votes “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Did Not Vote |
JPR Commission Member Did Not Vote on Self |
Bales, Scott |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Brutinel, Robert |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Gould, Andrew |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Howe, Randall |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Johnsen, Diane |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Orozco, Patricia |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Thumma, Samuel |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Vasquez, Garye |
27 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
JUDGES - DETAILS - APPELLATE COURTS
BALES, SCOTT Appointed to Supreme Court: 2005
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
95 percent
96 percent
98 percent
98 percent
99 percent |
100 percent
100 percent
N/A
N/A
100 percent |
Next Judge
BRUTINEL, ROBERT Appointed to Supreme Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
90 percent
99 percent
97 percent
99 percent
90 percent |
100 percent
100 percent
N/A
N/A
100 percent |
Next Judge
GOULD, ANDREW Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
89 percent
99 percent
98 percent
98 percent
94 percent |
99 percent
100 percent
N/A
N/A
100 percent |
Next Judge
HOWE, RANDALL Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
100 percent
100 percent
99 percent
94 percent |
100 percent
100 percent
N/A
N/A
100 percent |
Next Judge
JOHNSEN, DIANE Appointed to Court of Appeals Division 1: 2006
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
89 percent
98 percent
98 percent
98 percent
94 percent |
94 percent
90 percent
N/A
N/A
95 percent |
Next Judge
OROZCO, PATRICIA Appointed to Court of Appeals Division 1: 2004
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
89 percent
98 percent
98 percent
99 percent
91 percent |
97 percent
98 percent
N/A
N/A
100 percent |
Next Judge
THUMMA, SAMUEL Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
84 percent
100 percent
99 percent
100 percent
96 percent |
100 percent
100 percent
N/A
N/A
100 percent |
Next Judge
VASQUEZ, GARYE Appointed to Court of Appeals Division II: 2006
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
27 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards
2 Commissioners Did Not Vote |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
88 percent
97 percent
97 percent
100 percent
99 percent |
97 percent
98 percent
N/A
N/A
98 percent |
JUDGES - SUMMARY - PINAL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THE PINAL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES |
The following judges DO NOT MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
NONE |
The following judges MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
Gilberto V. Figueroa
Steven J. Fuller
Brenda E. Oldham
Daniel A. Washburn
Kevin D. White |
Judge |
JPR Votes “Meets” Judicial Standards |
JPR Votes “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Did Not Vote |
JPR Commission Member
Did Not Vote on
Self |
Figueroa, Gilberto |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Fuller, Steven |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Oldham, Brenda |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Washburn, Daniel |
27 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
White, Kevin |
28 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
JUDGES - DETAILS - PINAL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Next Judge
FIGUEROA, GILBERTO Elected to Pinal County Superior Court: 1998
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
97 percent
97 percent
95 percent
98 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
FULLER, STEVEN Elected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
99 percent
100 percent
93 percent
100 percent |
N/A
84 percent
74 percent
71 percent
83 percent |
Next Judge
OLDHAM, BRENDA Elected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
93 percent
96 percent
95 percent
93 percent
93 percent |
N/A
100 percent
94 percent
95 percent
93 percent |
Next Judge
WASHBURN, DANIEL Elected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
27 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
1 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards
1 Commissioner Did Not Vote |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
86 percent
97 percent
78 percent
84 percent
94 percent |
N/A
95 percent
95 percent
91 percent
97 percent |
Next Judge
WHITE, KEVIN Elected to Pinal County Superior Court: 2005
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
28 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
1 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
83 percent
87 percent
76 percent
75 percent
69 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
JUDGES - SUMMARY - PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THE PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES |
The following judges DO NOT MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
Catherine M. Woods |
The following judges MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
Jeffrey T. Bergin
Christopher Browning
Javier Chon-Lopez
Charles Harrington
Danelle B. Liwski
James E. Marner
Richard D. Nichols
Kathleen A. Quigley
Kenneth C. Stanford |
Judge |
JPR Votes “Meets” Judicial Standards |
JPR Votes “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Did Not Vote |
JPR Commission Member Did Not Vote on Self |
Bergin, Jeffrey |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Browning, Christopher |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Chon-Lopez, Javier |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Harrington, Charles |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Liwski, Danelle |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Marner, James |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Nichols, Richard |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Quigley, Kathleen |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Stanford, Kenneth |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Woods, Catherine |
7 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
JUDGES - DETAILS - PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
BERGIN, JEFFREY Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
98 percent
99 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
BROWNING, CHRISTOPHER Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1998
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
93 percent
96 percent
90 percent
99 percent |
N/A
98 percent
97 percent
98 percent
98 percent |
Next Judge
CHON-LOPEZ, JAVIER Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
87 percent
100 percent
91 percent
96 percent
82 percent |
N/A
99 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
HARRINGTON, CHARLES Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1999
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
98 percent
99 percent
98 percent
97 percent
99 percent |
N/A
96 percent
97 percent
94 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
LIWSKI, DANELLE Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
90 percent
90 percent
94 percent
97 percent |
N/A
86 percent
82 percent
82 percent
97 percent |
Next Judge
MARNER, JAMES Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
99 percent
99 percent
98 percent
100 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
NICHOLS, RICHARD Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1995
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
98 percent
96 percent
97 percent
99 percent |
N/A
97 percent
96 percent
98 percent
98 percent |
Next Judge
QUIGLEY, KATHLEEN Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
99 percent
100 percent
99 percent
100 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
STANFORD, KENNETH Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
88 percent
93 percent
93 percent
93 percent
99 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
95 percent |
Next Judge
WOODS, CATHERINE Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
7 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
22 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
80 percent
88 percent
76 percent
83 percent
82 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
JUDGES - SUMMARY - MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
RESULTS OF THE COMMISSION’S VOTE ON THE MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES |
The following judges DO NOT MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
Benjamin R. Norris |
The following judges MEET Judicial Performance Standards |
MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT: |
Mark F. Aceto
Aimee L. Anderson
Arthur T. Anderson
Bradley Astrowsky
Cynthia J. Bailey
Janet E. Barton
Edward W. Bassett
Dawn M. Bergin
James T. Blomo
Mark H. Brain
Roger E. Brodman
William L. Brotherton
Katherine M. Cooper
Janice K. Crawford
David O. Cunanan
Norman J. Davis
Sally S. Duncan
Boyd W. Dunn
Alfred M. Fenzel
Dean M. Fink
George H. Foster, Jr.
J. Richard Gama
Warren J. Granville
Hugh E. Hegyi
Michael J. Herrod
Bethany G. Hicks
Carey S. Hyatt
Brian K. Ishikawa
Joseph C. Kreamer
Daniel G. Martin
Rosa P. Mroz
Samuel J. Myers
Karen L. O’Connor
Susanna C. Pineda
Jay Polk
Gerald J. Porter
John C. Rea
Peter C. Reinstein
Emmet J. Ronan
Joan M. Sinclair
Pamela Hearn Svoboda
David M. Talamante
Danielle J. Viola
Randall H. Warner
Joseph C. Welty
Eileen S. Willett |
Judge |
JPR Votes “Meets” Judicial Standards |
JPR Votes “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Did Not Vote |
JPR Commission Member Did Not Vote on Self |
Aceto, Mark |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Anderson, Aimee |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Anderson, Arthur |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Astrowsky, Bradley |
25 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
Bailey, Cynthia |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Barton, Janet |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Bassett, Edward |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Bergin, Dawn |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Blomo, James |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Brain, Mark |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Brodman, Roger |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Brotherton, William |
28 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Cooper, Katherine |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Crawford, Janice |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cunanan, David |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Davis, Norman |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Duncan, Sally |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dunn, Boyd |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Fenzel, Alfred |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Fink, Dean |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Foster, George |
28 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Gama, J. Richard |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Granville, Warren |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Hegyi, Hugh |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Herrod, Michael |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Hicks, Bethany |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Hyatt, Carey |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Ishikawa, Brian |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Kreamer, Joseph |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Martin, Daniel |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mroz, Rosa |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Myers, Samuel |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Norris, Benjamin |
3 |
25 |
1 |
0 |
O’Connor, Karen |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Pineda, Susanna |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Polk, Jay |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Porter, Gerald |
18 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
Rea, John |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Reinstein, Peter |
28 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Ronan, Emmet |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sinclair, Joan |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Svoboda, Pamela |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Talamante, David |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Viola, Danielle |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Warner, Randall |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Welty, Joseph |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Willett, Eileen |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
JUDGES - SUMMARY - MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
ACETO, MARK Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
96 percent
99 percent
98 percent
97 percent
99 percent |
N/A
97 percent
92 percent
95 percent
98 percent |
Next Judge
ANDERSON, AIMEE Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
100 percent
97 percent
92 percent
93 percent |
N/A
84 percent
75 percent
80 percent
76 percent |
Next Judge
ANDERSON, ARTHUR Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
90 percent
96 percent
91 percent
90 percent
88 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
ASTROWSKY, BRADLEY Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
25 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
4 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
92 percent
92 percent
91 percent
77 percent
83 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
BAILEY, CYNTHIA Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
96 percent
96 percent
96 percent
93 percent
98 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
BARTON, JANET Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
93 percent
100 percent |
N/A
0 percent
0 percent
0 percent
0 percent |
Next Judge
BASSETT, EDWARD Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2008
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
95 percent
100 percent
100 percent
96 percent
100 percent |
N/A
94 percent
87 percent
94 percent
97 percent |
Next Judge
BERGIN, DAWN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
90 percent
99 percent
93 percent
94 percent
95 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
BLOMO, JAMES Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
96 percent
90 percent
76 percent
89 percent |
N/A
100 percent
98 percent
99 percent
99 percent |
Next Judge
BRAIN, MARK Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
92 percent
99 percent
96 percent
96 percent
99 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
BRODMAN, ROGER Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
95 percent
98 percent
96 percent
96 percent
99 percent |
N/A
92 percent
94 percent
87 percent
89 percent |
Next Judge
BROTHERTON, WILLIAM Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
28 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
1 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
88 percent
90 percent
89 percent
74 percent
95 percent |
N/A
95 percent
97 percent
99 percent
98 percent |
Next Judge
COOPER, CATHERINE Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
93 percent
99 percent
92 percent
98 percent
98 percent |
N/A
98 percent
83 percent
88 percent
92 percent |
Next Judge
CRAWFORD, JANICE Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
98 percent
99 percent
97 percent
98 percent
99 percent |
N/A
88 percent
86 percent
80 percent
82 percent |
Next Judge
CUNANAN, DAVID Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
92 percent
96 percent
88 percent
92 percent
96 percent |
N/A
97 percent
75 percent
75 percent
79 percent |
Next Judge
DAVIS, NORMAN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judge Davis is the Maricopa County Presiding Judge and was reviewed on administrative duties. |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
All Respondents |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
N/A
97 percent
98 percent
98 percent
98 percent |
Next Judge
DUNCAN, SALLY Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
92 percent
95 percent
90 percent
93 percent
94 percent |
N/A
95 percent
67 percent
90 percent
76 percent |
Next Judge
DUNN, BOYD Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
90 percent
90 percent
84 percent
84 percent
84 percent |
N/A
90 percent
91 percent
89 percent
88 percent |
Next Judge
FENZEL, ALFRED Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
98 percent
95 percent
95 percent
97 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
FINK, DEAN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
93 percent
98 percent
95 percent
99 percent
99 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
FOSTER, JR., GEORGE Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2003
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
28 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards
1 JPR Commission Member-Did Not Vote on Self |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
89 percent
94 percent
86 percent
86 percent
91 percent |
N/A
79 percent
68 percent
74 percent
73 percent |
Next Judge
GAMA, J. RICHARD Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
96 percent
99 percent
99 percent
98 percent
95 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
GRANVILLE, WARREN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
99 percent
99 percent
100 percent
99 percent
100 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
97 percent |
Next Judge
HEGYI, HUGH Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
77 percent
97 percent
86 percent
86 percent
90 percent |
N/A
94 percent
78 percent
82 percent
78 percent |
Next Judge
HERROD, MICHAEL Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
95 percent
98 percent
96 percent
99 percent
97 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
HICKS, BETHANY Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
95 percent
94 percent
95 percent
98 percent |
N/A
90 percent
88 percent
91 percent
93 percent |
Next Judge
HYATT, CAREY Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
96 percent
98 percent
94 percent
92 percent
98 percent |
N/A
98 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
ISHIKAWA, BRIAN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
95 percent
99 percent
95 percent
98 percent
97 percent |
N/A
100 percent
99 percent
99 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
KREAMER, JOSEPH Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
96 percent
100 percent
100 percent
99 percent
99 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
MARTIN, DANIEL Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
90 percent
90 percent
91 percent
91 percent
94 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
MROZ, ROSA Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
100 percent
99 percent
97 percent
100 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
MYERS, SAMUEL Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
97 percent
100 percent
96 percent
100 percent
99 percent |
N/A
99 percent
96 percent
96 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
NORRIS, BENJAMIN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2008
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
3 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
25 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards
1 Commissioner Did Not Vote |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
75 percent
87 percent
67 percent
59 percent
84 percent |
N/A
93 percent
86 percent
89 percent
90 percent |
Next Judge
O’CONNOR, KAREN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
92 percent
91 percent
94 percent
94 percent
98 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
PINEDA, SUSANNA Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
86 percent
99 percent
98 percent
96 percent
90 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
POLK, JAY Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
95 percent
98 percent
94 percent
94 percent
96 percent |
N/A
88 percent
80 percent
73 percent
67 percent |
Next Judge
PORTER, GERALD Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
18 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
11 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
93 percent
96 percent
88 percent
90 percent
95 percent |
N/A
77 percent
66 percent
66 percent
70 percent |
Next Judge
REA, JOHN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
97 percent
100 percent
98 percent
99 percent
99 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
REINSTEIN, PETER Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1998
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
28 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
1 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
92 percent
89 percent
80 percent
94 percent |
N/A
98 percent
86 percent
89 percent
88 percent |
Next Judge
RONAN, EMMET Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
96 percent
98 percent
96 percent
97 percent
96 percent |
N/A
99 percent
96 percent
99 percent
97 percent |
Next Judge
SINCLAIR, JOAN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
94 percent
99 percent
98 percent
99 percent
84 percent |
N/A
100 percent
98 percent
98 percent
99 percent |
Next Judge
SVOBODA, PAMELA Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2012
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
N/A
92 percent
92 percent
92 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
TALAMANTE, DAVID Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
98 percent
96 percent
94 percent
96 percent
98 percent |
N/A
92 percent
86 percent
89 percent
91 percent |
Next Judge
VIOLA, DANIELLE Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2011
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
98 percent
98 percent
98 percent
98 percent
98 percent |
N/A
83 percent
75 percent
83 percent
86 percent |
Next Judge
WARNER, RANDALL Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
98 percent
99 percent
99 percent
99 percent
100 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
WELTY, JOSEPH Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2007
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
99 percent
100 percent |
N/A
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent
100 percent |
Next Judge
WILLETT, EILEEN Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS
29 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards
0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Litigant/Witness Responses |
Legal Ability
Integrity
Communication Skills
Judicial Temperament
Administrative Performance |
97 percent
100 percent
98 percent
99 percent
100 percent |
N/A
92 percent
91 percent
94 percent
94 percent |
Skip back to Main Menu for this Guide