2006 Ballot Propositions & Judicial Performance Review

2006 Ballot Propositions	Arizona Secretary of State
Table of Contents - PDF	Election Services
Ballot Proposition Voter's Guide - PDF	Election Information
Judicial Performance Review Voter's Guide - PDF	Contact Us

100	101	102	103	104	105	106	107
200	201	202	203	204	205	206	207
300	301	302

2006 REVIEW OF

JUDGES' PERFORMANCE

The information in this pamphlet is provided to help you decide how you want to vote on the

judges listed on the 2006 ballot.

Information on the Arizona Supreme Court justices and Court of Appeals judges begins on Page 209.
Information on the Pima County Superior Court judges begins on Page 213.
Information on the Maricopa County Superior Court judges begins on Page 217.
A JUDGE CHECKLIST is provided on the back inside cover of the pamphlet, Page 234 & 236.
After reviewing a judge's information, mark "Yes" or "No" next to the judge's name on the checklist.
Use the checklist when marking your ballot.
For more information about the judge review process or the JPR Commission, please contact:

Arizona Commission on Judicial Performance Review

1501 West Washington Street

Suite 227

Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3231

E-mail: [email protected]

Internet: www.azjudges.info or www.azjudgereviews.info

Telephone: (602) 364-0098 or (602) 452-3098

This publication can be provided in alternative formats upon request.

HURWITZ, ANDREW D.

Appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 291

Surveys Returned: 117

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 34

Surveys Returned: 14

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

97%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

100%

N/A

100%

N/A

McGREGOR, RUTH V.
Chief Justice

Appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court: 1998

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Chief Judge

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 54

Surveys Returned: 30

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 685

Surveys Returned: 364

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 124

Surveys Returned: 44

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

96%

98%

99%

Score (See Footnote)

92%

100%

98%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

100%

N/A

97%

N/A

KESSLER, DONN G.

Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 629

Surveys Returned: 144

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 167

Surveys Returned: 36

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

95%

100%

98%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

100%

N/A

100%

N/A

NORRIS, PATRICIA K.

Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 463

Surveys Returned: 100

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 123

Surveys Returned: 39

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

88%

99%

98%

99%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

97%

100%

N/A

93%

N/A

PORTLEY, MAURICE.

Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 663

Surveys Returned: 187

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 174

Surveys Returned: 75

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

91%

98%

100%

99%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

97%

100%

N/A

98%

N/A

BRAMMER, JR., J. WILLIAM

Appointed to Court of Appeals Division II: 1997

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 525

Surveys Returned: 406

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 186

Surveys Returned: 155

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

89%

97%

96%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

99%

100%

N/A

96%

N/A

ECKERSTROM, PETER J.

Appointed to Court of Appeals Division II: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 157

Surveys Returned: 56

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 18

Surveys Returned: 6

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

90%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

88%

100%

N/A

100%

N/A

ESPINOSA, PHILIP G.

Appointed to Court of Appeals Division II: 1992

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 454

Surveys Returned: 318

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 175

Surveys Returned: 116

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

88%

96%

98%

88%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

94%

99%

N/A

94%

N/A

HOWARD, JOSEPH W.

Appointed to Court of Appeals Division II: 1997

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 438

Surveys Returned: 356

Superior Court Judge Responses

Surveys Distributed: 193

Surveys Returned: 137

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

87%

98%

97%

96%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

99%

100%

N/A

97%

N/A

PIMA JUDGE REVIEWS

ALFRED, MICHAEL D.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1992

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 142

Surveys Returned: 51

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 32

Surveys Returned: 2

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 17

Surveys Returned: 5

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

98%

100%

96%

98%

99%

88%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

89%

100%

83%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

BOREK, TED B.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2000

27 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

NOTE: Judge Borek is a member of the JPR Commission who could not vote on his own performance finding.

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 185

Surveys Returned: 39

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 118

Surveys Returned: 41

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 117

Surveys Returned: 43

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

98%

99%

95%

99%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

100%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

100%

N/A

BROWNING, CHRISTOPHER C.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1998

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 193

Surveys Returned: 26

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 70

Surveys Returned: 11

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 16

Surveys Returned: 10

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

94%

99%

100%

96%

99%

92%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

89%

90%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

CAMPOY, HECTOR E.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 168

Surveys Returned: 41

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 198

Surveys Returned: 53

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 90

Surveys Returned: 34

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

N/A

CHANDLER, TERRY

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 2004

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 98

Surveys Returned: 34

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 578

Surveys Returned: 119

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

99%

100%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

97%

98%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

CRUIKSHANK, MICHAEL

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal, Presiding Judge -Criminal Department

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1998

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 13

Surveys Returned: 12

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 220

Surveys Returned: 45

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 142

Surveys Returned: 44

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 87

Surveys Returned: 33

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

95%

N/A

98%

Score (See Footnote)

96%

97%

93%

95%

100%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

100%

99%

N/A

DAVIS, JOHN E.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1996

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 240

Surveys Returned: 73

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 52

Surveys Returned: 5

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 18

Surveys Returned: 6

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

95%

100%

95%

100%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

100%

94%

85%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

HARRINGTON, CHARLES V.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil, Presiding Judge -

Civil Department

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 8

Surveys Returned: 5

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 207

Surveys Returned: 68

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 56

Surveys Returned: 14

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 17

Surveys Returned: 6

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

100%

Score (See Footnote)

100%

95%

94%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

KELLY, JOHN F.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1988

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 181

Surveys Returned: 57

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 46

Surveys Returned: 14

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 9

Surveys Returned: 2

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

92%

99%

96%

99%

100%

82%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

NICHOLS, RICHARD D.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Pima County Superior Court: 1995

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 121

Surveys Returned: 33

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 154

Surveys Returned: 21

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

94%

99%

92%

95%

94%

91%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

95%

98%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

MARICOPA JUDGE REVIEWS

ACETO, MARK F.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 182

Surveys Returned: 47

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 45

Surveys Returned: 12

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 35

Surveys Returned: 17

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

98%

99%

100%

98%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

ANDERSON, ARTHUR T.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 152

Surveys Returned: 53

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 356

Surveys Returned: 35

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

96%

97%

95%

98%

95%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

89%

88%

92%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

BARTON, JANET E.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

26 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

2 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 256

Surveys Returned: 58

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 69

Surveys Returned: 12

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 42

Surveys Returned: 20

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

90%

94%

88%

78%

97%

89%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

96%

100%

96%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

100%

N/A

BUDOFF, ROBERT

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 124

Surveys Returned: 47

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 347

Surveys Returned: 48

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

95%

96%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

BURKE, EDWARD O.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

26 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

2 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 167

Surveys Returned: 36

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 96

Surveys Returned: 8

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 105

Surveys Returned: 40

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

81%

96%

90%

85%

92%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

100%

94%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

100%

99%

N/A

CHAVEZ, HARRIETT E.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil/Family/Probate

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 118

Surveys Returned: 40

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 350

Surveys Returned: 53

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

96%

99%

95%

99%

97%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

89%

90%

88%

89%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

DAIRMAN, DENNIS W.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1992

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 127

Surveys Returned: 19

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 58

Surveys Returned: 5

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 53

Surveys Returned: 13

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

93%

98%

86%

95%

87%

93%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

100%

95%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

95%

96%

97%

N/A

DAVIS, NORMAN J.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family, Presiding Judge -

Family Department

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 38

Surveys Returned: 15

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 27

Surveys Returned: 7

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 122

Surveys Returned: 16

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

100%

Score (See Footnote)

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

DONAHOE, GARY E.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 140

Surveys Returned: 38

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 88

Surveys Returned: 20

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 83

Surveys Returned: 46

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

95%

98%

96%

94%

100%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

DOWNIE, MARGARET H.

Assignment During Survey Period: Associate Presiding Judge

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 133

Surveys Returned: 59

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 134

Surveys Returned: 35

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 14

Surveys Returned: 1

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

98%

100%

97%

N/A

97%

Score (See Footnote)

97%

96%

97%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

No Ratings

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

DUNCAN, SALLY S.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 210

Surveys Returned: 64

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 242

Surveys Returned: 21

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

95%

93%

92%

96%

91%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

95%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

FENZEL, ALFRED M.

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 90

Surveys Returned: 18

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 114

Surveys Returned: 13

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

FOSTER, GEORGE H.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 109

Surveys Returned: 28

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 272

Surveys Returned: 45

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

92%

100%

89%

100%

93%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

96%

97%

93%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

GAINES, PENDLETON

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

27 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

NOTE: Judge Gaines is a member of the JPR Commission who could not vote on his own performance finding.

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 342

Surveys Returned: 120

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 112

Surveys Returned: 23

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 46

Surveys Returned: 20

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

98%

97%

98%

96%

99%

96%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

96%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

GAMA, J. RICHARD.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 263

Surveys Returned: 48

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 43

Surveys Returned: 7

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 64

Surveys Returned: 44

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

98%

100%

95%

100%

98%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

97%

83%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

98%

N/A

GAYLORD, JOHN M.

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

27 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

1 Commissioner Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 91

Surveys Returned: 23

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 681

Surveys Returned: 103

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

91%

94%

92%

95%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

95%

91%

90%

91%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

GRANT, LARRY

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 129

Surveys Returned: 40

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 337

Surveys Returned: 34

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

91%

98%

85%

96%

90%

92%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

93%

91%

90%

96%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

GRANVILLE, WARREN J.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 138

Surveys Returned: 36

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 44

Surveys Returned: 6

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 44

Surveys Returned: 23

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

96%

100%

96%

99%

91%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

HAUSER, BRIAN R.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1991

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 179

Surveys Returned: 32

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 93

Surveys Returned: 10

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 75

Surveys Returned: 22

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

97%

100%

98%

100%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

100%

97%

N/A

HEILMAN, JOSEPH B.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil/Family/Probate

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 71

Surveys Returned: 27

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 292

Surveys Returned: 20

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

95%

93%

96%

92%

96%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

90%

95%

85%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

HICKS, BETHANY G.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

27 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

1 Commissioner Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 236

Surveys Returned: 41

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 83

Surveys Returned: 2

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 92

Surveys Returned: 53

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

62%

94%

73%

82%

87%

77%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

HOAG, M. JEAN

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1996

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 94

Surveys Returned: 23

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 136

Surveys Returned: 29

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

98%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

HOLT, CATHY M.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 215

Surveys Returned: 33

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 41

Surveys Returned: 2

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 80

Surveys Returned: 31

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

94%

100%

97%

98%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

95%

100%

95%

N/A

HOTHAM, JEFFREY A.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1987

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 173

Surveys Returned: 42

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 306

Surveys Returned: 31

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

93%

92%

97%

90%

96%

89%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

92%

93%

90%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

HOUSER, ROBERT C.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2002

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 325

Surveys Returned: 78

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 95

Surveys Returned: 24

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 17

Surveys Returned: 10

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

99%

97%

98%

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

96%

92%

91%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

HYATT, CAREY S.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 20

Surveys Returned: 5

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 426

Surveys Returned: 49

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

90%

96%

100%

80%

83%

75%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

90%

92%

88%

90%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

ISHIKAWA, BRIAN K.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 260

Surveys Returned: 61

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 24

Surveys Returned: 5

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 46

Surveys Returned: 15

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

98%

97%

98%

99%

100%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

91%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

JONES, MICHAEL D.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1995

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 150

Surveys Returned: 37

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 58

Surveys Returned: 12

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 19

Surveys Returned: 11

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

99%

95%

100%

96%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

96%

92%

91%

88%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

98%

91%

98%

94%

N/A

KEPPEL, JAMES H.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal, Presiding Judge -

Criminal Department

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1996

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 50

Surveys Returned: 22

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 206

Surveys Returned: 53

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 6

Surveys Returned: 1

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 148

Surveys Returned: 21

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

100%

98%

N/A

97%

Score (See Footnote)

100%

96%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

100%

N/A

LEE, RAYMOND

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 173

Surveys Returned: 61

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 451

Surveys Returned: 76

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

99%

98%

94%

96%

99%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

97%

98%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

MANGUM, J. KENNETH

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1990

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 98

Surveys Returned: 26

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 230

Surveys Returned: 29

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

MROZ, ROSA P.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 143

Surveys Returned: 43

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 351

Surveys Returned: 45

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

96%

97%

96%

97%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

96%

93%

95%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

MUNDELL, BARBARA RODRIGUEZ

Assignment During Survey Period: Presiding Judge

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1991

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 237

Surveys Returned: 88

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 9

Surveys Returned: 1

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 34

Surveys Returned: 1

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

96%

95%

96%

95%

N/A

94%

Score (See Footnote)

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

O'CONNOR, KAREN L.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil, Presiding Judge -

Probate/Mental Health Department

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 14

Surveys Returned: 11

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 72

Surveys Returned: 25

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 88

Surveys Returned: 13

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 27

Surveys Returned: 8

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

100%

Score (See Footnote)

86%

91%

86%

94%

93%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

O'TOOLE, THOMAS W.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1984

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 201

Surveys Returned: 34

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 68

Surveys Returned: 5

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 78

Surveys Returned: 35

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

95%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

98%

99%

95%

N/A

RAYES, DOUGLAS L.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 204

Surveys Returned: 50

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 92

Surveys Returned: 10

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 56

Surveys Returned: 13

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

98%

100%

97%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

REA, JOHN C.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2004

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 194

Surveys Returned: 57

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 501

Surveys Returned: 48

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

99%

100%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

90%

89%

92%

90%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

REINSTEIN, PETER C.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1998

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 246

Surveys Returned: 69

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 58

Surveys Returned: 7

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 17

Surveys Returned: 7

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

91%

96%

90%

92%

97%

87%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

RONAN, EMMET J.

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile, Presiding Judge -

Juvenile Department

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2000

28 Commissioners Voted Yes

0 Commissioners Voted No

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Presiding Judge Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 20

Surveys Returned: 9

Attorney

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 49

Surveys Returned: 11

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 146

Surveys Returned: 24

Juror

Responses

Surveys

Distributed: 9

Surveys Returned: 2

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

87%

97%

92%

N/A

97%

Score (See Footnote)

100%

94%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

90%

100%

N/A

SCHWARTZ, JONATHAN H.

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1991

26 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

2 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 126

Surveys Returned: 29

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 120

Surveys Returned: 13

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 9

Surveys Returned: 4

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

86%

94%

89%

71%

77%

90%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

99%

100%

94%

97%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

92%

N/A

SWANN, PETER B.

Assignment During Survey Period: Civil

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2003

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 284

Surveys Returned: 84

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 46

Surveys Returned: 10

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 18

Surveys Returned: 12

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

99%

100%

99%

100%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

98%

96%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

N/A

TALAMANTE, DAVID M.

Assignment During Survey Period: Criminal

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 206

Surveys Returned: 34

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 101

Surveys Returned: 14

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 95

Surveys Returned: 33

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

96%

98%

99%

93%

99%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

93%

98%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

100%

97%

N/A

VERDIN, MARIA DEL MAR

Assignment During Survey Period: Juvenile

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

27 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

NOTE: Judge Verdin is a member of the JPR Commission who could not vote on her own performance finding.

Judicial Performance Standards Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 99

Surveys Returned: 19

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 303

Surveys Returned: 34

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

99%

100%

97%

100%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

98%

100%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

WILKINSON, MICHAEL O.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1987

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 142

Surveys Returned: 33

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 421

Surveys Returned: 32

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

100%

96%

97%

99%

94%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

95%

94%

93%

96%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

WILLETT, EILEEN S.

Assignment During Survey Period: Family

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1999

28 Commissioners Voted "Meets"

0 Commissioners Voted "Does Not Meet"

Judicial Performance Standards

Evaluation Categories

Attorney

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 139

Surveys Returned: 44

Litigant, Witness, ProPer Responses

Surveys Distributed: 249

Surveys Returned: 24

Juror

Responses

Surveys Distributed: 0

Surveys Returned: 0

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

Settlement Activities

Administrative Skills

Score (See Footnote)

91%

96%

93%

94%

93%

90%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

98%

96%

95%

N/A

Score (See Footnote)

N/A

The Ballot Format displayed in HTML reflects only the text of the Ballot Proposition and does not reflect how it will appear on the General Election Ballot.
Spelling, grammar, and punctuation were reproduced as submitted in the "for" and "against" arguments.

JANICE K. BREWER
Arizona Secretary of State

Disclaimer