PROPOSITION
100
AN INITIATIVE MEASURE
PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO
ARTICLE IX OF THE ARIZONA CONSTITUTION BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 24 RELATING
TO A PROHIBITION OF ANY NEW REAL PROPERTY SALE OR TRANSFER TAX IN ARIZONA.
Be it enacted by
the People of the State of Arizona:
1. Article IX, Section
24, Constitution of Arizona is proposed to be added as follows if approved
by the voters and on proclamation of the Governor:
ARTICLE IX, SECTION 24, PROHIBITION OF NEW REAL PROPERTY SALE OR TRANSFER TAXES
THE STATE, ANY COUNTY, CITY, TOWN, MUNICIPALITY OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE, OR ANY DISTRICT CREATED BY LAW WITH AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE ANY TAX, FEE, STAMP REQUIREMENT OR OTHER ASSESSMENT, SHALL NOT IMPOSE ANY NEW TAX, FEE, STAMP REQUIREMENT OR OTHER ASSESSMENT, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, ON THE ACT OR PRIVILEGE OF SELLING, PURCHASING, GRANTING, ASSIGNING, TRANSFERRING, RECEIVING, OR OTHERWISE CONVEYING ANY INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY. THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO ANY TAX, FEE, OR OTHER ASSESSMENT IN EXISTENCE ON DECEMBER 31, 2007.
2. The Secretary
of State shall submit this amendment to the voters at the next general
election as provided by Article XXI of the Arizona Constitution.
Proposition 100 would amend
the Arizona Constitution to prohibit the state or any county, city, town
or other political subdivision of the state from directly or indirectly
imposing any new tax, fee or other assessment on the sale, purchase,
transfer or other conveyance of any interest in real property (such as
homes and other real estate). This proposed measure would not affect
any tax, fee or other assessment in existence prior to this year.
State law requires the Joint
Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC) Staff to prepare a summary of the
fiscal impact of certain ballot measures. Proposition 100 is not estimated
to have a direct state or local fiscal impact. The proposition prohibits
the imposition of new fees or taxes on the sale or transfer of real property
after December 31, 2007. No such new fee or tax has been enacted since
that date. The level of foregone revenues cannot be predicted in advance
as it would depend on the specific details of a particular tax proposal.
As the Chairman and Treasurer
of the Protect Our Homes Initiative, we urge all Arizonans to vote YES
for Proposition 100, a cause we truly believe in - protecting our families
and businesses from a damaging real estate sales or transfer tax on our
homes or property.
A real estate sales or transfer
tax is both unfair to Arizonans and bad fiscal policy for our economy.
Since home and property owners already pay annual property taxes, an
additional tax, levied at the time people buy, sell or even transfer
ownership of their home into a legal trust or to a family member, would
be double taxation. Proposition 100 will protect the equity that people
have worked so hard to build in their homes and property, equity that
would be negatively impacted by the increased costs associated with a
real estate sales or transfer tax. Further, our initiative will help
keep housing affordable in Arizona by preventing a rise in closing costs
and will allow more Arizonans and their families to purchase a home or
property while protecting those living on a fixed or low income.
Protecting families and businesses
from double taxation and keeping housing affordable is good for Arizonans
and for our economy. We are proud to serve this initiative as the Chairman
and Treasurer because we truly believe the Protect Our Homes Initiative
is the right thing for you and the right thing for Arizona. Please join
us in voting YES on Proposition 100 to protect our communities from unfair
real estate sales or transfer taxes.
|
Frank Dickens,
Chairman, Protect Our Homes, Phoenix
|
Craig Sanford,
Treasurer, Protect Our Homes, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes"
|
As an Arizona homeowner
since 1974 and a current candidate for the Pima County Board of Supervisors,
I strongly
support this initiative to prohibit
any new sales tax on our homes and property.
It's a matter of government
fiscal accountability. There's no amount of money that a financially
irresponsible administration cannot spend. Voters must monitor how
carefully our elected officials use the dollars they've already been
given. Our enormous state budget deficit and record levels of spending
in Pima County in recent years make it clear that these folks don't
deserve even more of our hard-earned cash.
It's common for spendthrift
governments to waste money or to underfund their mandated responsibilities
and then cry to taxpayers for more financing. For example, although
road maintenance is a top mandate for all Arizona counties, Pima County "puts
NO general fund money toward maintenance." (Arizona Daily Star,
5-18-2008) This is absurd.
Governments collect windfalls
on our homes each year in the form of property taxes. Now they're contemplating
additional taxation to make beleaguered taxpayers bail them out of
their financial mess.
Don't allow it. The answer
is responsible spending, not higher taxes.
A demand for more money
typically indicates that government has failed to live within its means.
Families and individuals can't legally reach into their fellow citizens'
pockets in tight fiscal times. Overspending governments shouldn't be
allowed to do it either. With real estate sales dropping, new taxes
will serve only to further depress the economy and put home purchases
farther out of reach, especially for first-time buyers. Vote YES to
approve Prop 100. Stop all levels of Arizona government from being
even more wasteful with your taxes.
ARGUMENT
IN FAVOR OF THE PROTECT OUR HOMES INITIATIVE
On behalf of the Arizona
chapter of Americans for Prosperity (www.aztaxpayers.org) ,
we encourage all Arizona taxpayers to vote YES on the Protect Our Homes
Initiative to protect working Arizonans and their families from a harmful
real estate sales or transfer tax. Too often, governments in other
states have used a real estate sales or transfer tax as a new source
of revenue to balance bloated budgets. Once this type of tax is put
in place, no matter how low the rate is in the beginning, it always
ends up being raised. The results are substantial increases in fees
for real estate closing.
In Arizona, we already
pay multiple taxes and fees on our homes, making a real estate sales
or transfer tax a form of double (or triple) taxation, which we can
all agree is wrong. Further, a real estate sales or transfer tax would
add yet another layer to the costs of closing. That would decrease
your equity and damage your ability to sell your home. That would hurt
everyone in Arizona. Our state economy is already in a recession, and
a real estate sales or transfer tax would make that situation even
worse by hurting our state's economic growth. We believe that it is
vital to protect home buyers from a real estate sales or transfer tax,
so again, we urge all Arizona taxpayers to vote YES on Prop 100, the
Protect Our Homes Initiative.
|
Chad Kirkpatrick,
Arizona Chairman, Americans for Prosperity, Phoenix
|
Thomas Jenney,
Arizona Director, Americans for Prosperity, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Americans for Prosperity"
|
The Arizona
Tax Revolt strongly urges a YES VOTE on Proposition 100.
The Arizona Tax Revolt www.ArizonaTaxRevolt.org has
been fighting for lower property taxes since 2006. Though this measure
will not reduce existing property taxes, since today there isn't a
real estate transfer tax, it will assure that a real estate transfer
tax can never be collected. This measure takes us a step closer to
a predictable and affordable property taxation system.
The Arizona Tax Revolt
met with and was instrumental in convincing the Arizona Association
of Realtors to champion this initiative which effectively precludes
a transfer tax on the sale of real property.
The state faces significant
fiscal challenges due in large part to overspending. Without this important
taxpayer protection it is likely that government will enact new taxes
on real estate sales. These taxes could be as much as a full year's
property tax bill, or even higher merely for the privilege of a rubber
stamp upon recordation of the transfer of ownership. A transfer tax
would further reduce property values and the equity in our homes.
Everyone knows that the
property taxation system is in need of an overhaul. With your support
between now and 2010 the Arizona Tax Revolt will bring about a long
overdue reduction in your property taxes. After all there is no reason
why your taxable valuation and tax bill should increase due to real
estate price inflation and unrestrained property tax levy increases.
The 2% levy limit has worked well for primary taxing entities and must
be expanded to keep secondary taxes and our property tax bills in check.
Please join us and Vote YES!!!
|
Marc Goldstone,
Chairman, Arizona Tax Revolt in support of C-13-2008, Bullhead
City
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Tax Revolt in support of C-13-2008"
|
Vote YES on Proposition
100 and protect your property from another tax.
This initiative would prohibit
any transfer or sales tax on the sale of real property including your
home, business, farm, ranch or rental property. Since Arizona does
not currently have such a tax, there are no fiscal impacts on government.
This initiative simply removes the temptation of government to enact
it. We view these types of taxes, particularly on your business, farm,
ranch or rental property as a form of triple taxation - a path we wish
to avoid in Arizona for real property owners already paying their fare
share through property, capital gains and income taxes.
|
Kevin Rogers,
President, Arizona Farm Bureau, Gilbert
|
Jim Klinker,
Chief Administrative Officer, Arizona Farm Bureau, Gilbert
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Farm Bureau"
|
Arizona
Chamber of Commerce & Industry Urges YES Vote on Protect Our
Homes
As Chairman-Elect and President
of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, we understand that
voting YES on the Protect Our Homes initiative will provide the strongest
form of protection possible from a real estate sales or transfer tax.
Such a tax would affect both big and small businesses as well as individuals
and families. Because home and business owners already contribute to
the state through annual property taxes, an additional tax would be
double taxation. We think we can all agree this is unfair and is not
the type of smart, fiscal policy we need to stimulate the Arizona economy.
In fact, a real estate sales or transfer tax would do just the opposite
by creating barriers to home and property ownership, stifling growth
and job creation, and making it harder for businesses to succeed in
Arizona. As businessmen and family men, we want to make sure that such
a tax never becomes a reality. We are voting YES on Protect Our Homes
to ensure that Arizona businesses and families are never harmed by
such a damaging tax.
|
Glenn Hamer,
President & CEO, Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
Phoenix
|
Don Robinson,
Chairman-Elect, Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry"
|
Prohibit
Double Taxation NOW!
A "Yes" vote
on Proposition 100, the "Protect Our Homes" citizen's initiative,
will prohibit the state, county, or city from double taxing your home
or business facility through a real estate transfer tax. A real estate
transfer tax is essentially a new sales tax that is assessed on your
home or business when the property is sold or transferred from one
party to another.
VOTE YES
on Prop 100, the "Protect Our Homes" citizen's initiative
because:
-
Real estate sales
or transfer taxes are regressive and therefore higher for lower income
households;
-
Real estate sales
or transfer taxes are discriminatory as they single out one type
of asset - real estate - while similar taxes are rarely applied to
financial assets, such as stocks and bonds;
-
A real estate sales
or transfer tax will make Arizona less attractive for commercial
recruitment by major companies in light of the higher cost of new
and existing housing resulting from a real estate sale or transfer
tax as the availability of quality affordable housing is often an
important factor in site selection decisions; and
-
A real estate sales
or transfer tax on commercial property would reduce not only the
amount of companies wanting to relocate to Arizona but also the number
of office and industrial projects built providing jobs for Arizonans.
At a time when property
taxes are increasing for most Arizonans along with record home foreclosures,
now is the time to act to prohibit this type of double taxation.
Please
vote "Yes" on Prop 100, the "Protect Our Homes" citizen's
initiative.
|
Tim Lawless,
President, Arizona Chapter of NAIOP, Phoenix
|
Chris Toci,
Chairman of the Board, Arizona Chapter of NAIOP, Paradise Valley
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Chapter of NAIOP"
|
The Arizona Contractors
Association urges voters to Protect Our Homes and vote YES on Proposition
100.
Arizonans have experienced
a rollercoaster ride in the housing market. Valuations roared up to
new heights only to come back to earth in a steep plunge that is only
now bottoming out.
Homeowners are uneasy with
the value of their single largest investment falling by 10 percent,
20 percent or even more.
The last thing we need
during an economic slowdown and uncertainty is the threat of new taxes
on those very same homes.
Voters know our state's
budget deficit continues to grow. We also know that every time the
budget is "balanced" another option is removed between us
taxpayers and a possible tax increase.
By voting YES on Proposition
100, we will ensure that politicians can't balance the budget through
a real estate transfer tax on our homes.
Passing Proposition 100
will support the value of our homes and promote the recovery of the
depressed housing market in Arizona.
A recovering housing market
with increase home values meaning a stronger economy and more jobs.
A YES
vote on Proposition 100 Protects Our Homes and Promotes a Strong
Economic Recovery.
The Arizona Contractors
Association (ACA) is a non-profit 501(c)6 business trade organization
that has been in existence for over 50 years. ACA is strictly a state
association whose membership consists of residential and commercial
general contractors, subcontractors of various trades, material suppliers,
developers, architects and engineers. Our mission is to provide corporate,
political and civic leadership in the Arizona construction industry
for the benefit of our companies, employees and communities.
|
Brett A.
Jones, Vice President of Operations, Arizona Contractors Association,
Phoenix
|
Jeffery M.
Hall, General Counsel & Director, Arizona Contractors Association,
Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Contractors Association"
|
Arizona Cattlemen's Association
Letter in Support of
Proposition 100; the Protect
Our Homes Initiative
The Arizona Cattlemen's
Association (ACA) supports a YES vote on Proposition 100. Arizona's
ranch and beef producing families care for thousands of acres of open
space in Arizona. Arizona's ranch and beef producing families already
pay property and death taxes on these precious lands. We urge voters
to vote YES on Proposition 100 to stop bureaucrats from confiscating
even more of the value of our ranches, farms and homes. By voting YES
voters will stop government from imposing an additional real estate
sales tax on our lands. A YES vote will help us continue to produce
the most affordable food supply in the world. Vote YES on Proposition
100.
|
Tom Chilton,
President, Arizona Cattle Growers' (ACGA) Association, Phoenix,
|
Scott Schill,
President, Arizona Cattle Feeders' (ACFA) Association, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Cattlemen's Association"
|
Steve Pierce Letter in Support
of
Proposition 100; the Protect
Our Homes Initiative
As a life long steward
of ranch lands in Arizona I enthusiastically endorse Proposition 100.
My family has received conservation awards for going above and beyond
to protect the land and wildlife. My family already pays property taxes
each and every year on our ranch. We are also asked to pay the death
tax when the ranch is passed on from one generation to the next. Why
should my family have to pay an additional real estate sales tax when
we transfer or sell these beautiful ranch lands to the next generation?
A real estate transfer tax would be a tax on open space. Let's stop
real estate transfer taxes. Vote YES on Proposition 100.
|
Steve Pierce,
Prescott
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Cattlemen's Association"
|
As a former Governor of
Arizona and lifelong advocate of the citizens of Arizona, I am voting
YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative. A real estate sales or transfer
tax will make it even more difficult to buy and sell our homes or property
by raising closing costs. Further, it will drastically harm opportunities
for affordable housing in Arizona, which is a crucial component in
sustaining our communities. Arizonans deserve the opportunity to purchase
a home without being penalized with a form of double taxation. This
is not good for families and it is not good for the economy. By voting
YES, I am making a clear and conscious decision to support the citizens
of this state who currently own, or hope to someday own, a home or
start a business in the Valley of the Sun, along our borders, or in
our historical neighborhoods across the state. Without any foreseeable
benefits to families and businesses, a real estate sales or transfer
tax will impede on the ability to maintain a healthy and strong Arizona,
and that is why voting YES is so vital to the success of our community.
Vote YES with me to Protect Our Homes, our families, our businesses,
and our communities here in Arizona.
|
Rose Mofford,
Former Governor of Arizona, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As an Arizonan, a homeowner,
and a member of a family-owned company whose presence in Arizona has
endured since 1932, I am voting YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative.
Affordable housing for Bashas' members, my family, and the community
at large is a vital part of maintaining healthy, sustainable growth
here in Arizona. Simply, a real estate sales or transfer tax is not
the solution for affordable housing nor does it benefit local businesses
who own property. A real estate sales or transfer tax will not only
hinder the ability of fixed and low income families to purchase homes,
but it will also hurt local businesses in their real estate and property
transactions. By voting YES on Protect Our Homes, we will ensure that
more Arizonans have the ability to purchase homes and property without
the negative effects of double taxation. Arizona is a place where families
have had, and should continue to have, the opportunity to create generations
of homeowners and family owned businesses. This is the Arizona I know
and love, the Arizona that provided my family with the opportunity
for success and growth, and this is the Arizona I hope we want to preserve
for future generations. A real estate sales or transfer tax, in my
opinion, does not preserve the Arizona way of life; that is why I am
voting YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative to protect our families
from a real estate sales or transfer tax.
I earnestly solicit your
support on behalf of this proposition.
|
Eddie Basha,
Chandler
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a former Chairman of
the Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce and Member and President
of the Arizona Board of Regents, and as a founding Member and Director
of Southern Arizona Leadership Council, I understand the dynamics of
the Arizona economy, business and the greater community. I personally
urge the voters of Arizona to vote YES on the
Protect Our Homes Initiative. A YES vote will
have the effect of protecting all Arizonans from the harmful effects
of a real estate sales or transfer tax. Such a tax is unnecessary since
all Arizona homeowners and businesses already pay annual property taxes.
An additional tax in the form of a real estate sales or transfer tax
would be double taxation. This type of tax is just wrong, and is not
good for our economy, our businesses or our families. It would place
an additional and unneeded burden that would make it difficult for
both our businesses and families to flourish in this already slow economy.
This hurts everyone in Arizona. I am voting YES on
the Protect Our Homes Initiative to keep Arizona business and families
strong and protect our community against the damaging effects of a
real estate sales or transfer tax.
|
John F. Munger,
Munger Chadwick, P.L.C., Tucson
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a member of the Arizona
Senate and the Chairman of the Commerce and Economic Development Committee,
I enthusiastically endorse proposition 100, the Protect Our Homes Initiative.
Protecting Arizonans from the negative effects of a real estate sales
or transfer tax is necessary in order to ensure our economy remains
strong. Additional taxation will cause great harm to our economy by
making it more expensive to purchase or sell a home or business. This
tax will discourage economic development by punishing investment in
new business locations at a time when Arizona needs to attract new
jobs to our community. New taxes would put Arizona at a competitive
disadvantage while competing for those high paying jobs every state
wants to attract. Making it more expensive to buy and sell homes would
also add to the crisis we are experiencing in the housing market. Arizona's
economy is already hurting as a result of a weak housing market. Any
additional taxes would make its recovery much more difficult.
Voting "yes" on
the Protect our homes initiative will ensure that new taxes cannot
be imposed by the State or local governments. It is one of the most
important votes you will be casting this November. The Protect our
Homes initiative will protect our homes, our jobs and our economy.
Please join me in voting
yes on Proposition 100.
|
Barbara Leff,
State Senator, Legislative District 11, Paradise Valley
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative will keep both families and businesses strong
in Arizona. As a member of the Arizona State Senate and a fourteen
year member of the tax writing committee, I understand the importance
of sound tax policy for Arizona's economy. The real estate sales or
transfer tax is not good tax policy for our state. We already pay annual
taxes on our homes and property, so an additional tax would simply
burden families and businesses during a time of economic uncertainty.
A real estate transfer tax could damage affordable housing opportunities
for struggling families living on a low or fix income. We should not
be stifling economic growth and making it harder for families and businesses
to succeed with an unfair tax that makes no sense for our economy or
community. A real estate sales or transfer tax is bad fiscal policy
and will do nothing to encourage growth and sustainability in Arizona.
I am voting YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative to make sure we
stop this tax before it starts.
|
Ken Cheuvront,
State Senator, Legislative District 15, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Please vote YES on Proposition
100. The Protect Our Homes Initiative protects families, homeowners
and businesses from a tax increase. Real estate sales or transfer taxes
make no sense for Arizonans or our economy. A real estate sales or
transfer tax would be collected when you buy, sell or even transfer
ownership of your home or property into a legal trust or to a family
member. Since every home and business owner already pays annual property
taxes, a transfer tax is a form of double taxation. Why would we make
it harder and more expensive to buy a home at a time when our housing
market is already struggling? As a state senator, I know that enacting
such a tax would be poor fiscal policy and bad for Arizona, and that
is why I am voting YES on proposition 100 in order to permanently protect
our family and economy from the damaging effects of a real estate sales
or transfer tax.
|
Jim Waring,
State Senator, Legislative District 7, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a member of the Arizona
House of Representatives, I am Voting YES on Proposition 100, to support
the Protect Our Homes Initiative which is to protect Arizona home owners
and businesses, both big and small, from a real estate sales or transfer
tax. A real estate sales or transfer tax would place an additional
tax burden on homes or businesses, especially small and family-owned
businesses. Since all home owners and businesses already pay annual
property taxes, an additional tax would be a form of double taxation
- something that is unnecessary and wrong. The last thing we need in
this current economy is to stifle business growth and job creation
in Arizona. The state should not balance their budgets on the back
of hardworking Arizonans who work tirelessly to provide for their families
and their future and in turn stimulate our economy. I am voting YES
on the Protect Our Homes Initiative to protect Arizona and I urge you
to do the same.
|
John Nelson,
State Representative, Legislative District 12, Litchfield Park
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a retired Major General
with the Arizona National Guard I understand the importance of affordable
housing in Arizona - especially for our veterans and military personnel.
I know the difficulties many of our veterans and military personnel
face trying to get settled in a new life and a new career. A real estate
sales or transfer tax would make it that much harder to start that
life on the right foot by decreasing affordable housing opportunities
and making it more difficult to buy and sell homes in Arizona. Further,
such a tax would not only affect our veteran community and military
personnel, but it would also affect the most vulnerable populations
in our state. Home ownership is synonymous with the American Dream.
We should be doing everything we can to help everyone attain that dream
instead of building barriers against it. I am voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative to ensure that Arizona and our veteran community
are protected from a real estate transfer tax.
|
Donald L.
Owens, Former Adjutant General for Arizona National Guard, Fountain
Hills
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a former State Senator
and a proud Arizonan, I wholeheartedly endorse the Protect Our Homes
Initiative. Protecting Arizonans from the negative effects of a real
estates sales or transfer tax is imperative to keeping our state's
economy strong, encouraging the growth of business, and helping individuals
and families achieve their dream of homeownership. Everyone in Arizona
- both individuals and businesses - already pay annual taxes on their
home or property, so adding an additional tax is burdensome and equates
to double taxation. Further, a real estate sales or transfer tax would
damage the equity that people have worked hard to build in their home
or business. It is a lose-lose situation no matter how you look at
it. A real estate sales or transfer tax is bad for you, your family,
the economy, and Arizona. I am voting YES on the Protect Our Homes
Initiative to protect our present and future from a real estate sales
or transfer tax.
|
Thomas Patterson,
Paradise Valley
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on Proposition
100, Protect Our Homes, will keep the Arizona economy and community
healthy and strong by protecting our citizens from the damaging effects
of a real estate sales or transfer tax. As the former mayor of Phoenix,
I believe that an additional tax on our homes and property is bad for
both business and our families. We need to have fiscal policies that
allow our businesses to grow and keep housing affordable to protect
those living on a fixed or low income. Since both businesses and homeowners
already pay annual property taxes, a real estate sales or transfer
tax is a form of double taxation and makes no fiscal sense. Such a
tax does nothing but adds an unnecessary burden and damages the equity
that businesses and homeowners have worked hard to build. I am voting
YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative and I encourage all Arizonans
to do the same.
|
Paul Johnson,
Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a member of the Arizona
Housing Finance Authority, I am voting YES on the Protect Our Homes
Initiative to ensure that a real estate sales or transfer tax never
becomes a reality in Arizona. Having been a professional in the housing
market for 37 years, I firmly believe that a real estate sales or transfer
tax is not the type of tax policy we need for a healthy economy or
community in Arizona. This tax would dramatically increase the cost
of buying and selling a home, negatively impacting families living
on a low or fixed income. Hurting our already limited affordable housing
opportunities and disqualifying people from homeownership does not
help to build cohesive, thriving communities and does nothing to boost
our economy. Further, for those who already own a home, a real estate
sales or transfer tax would greatly damage the equity they have spent
a lifetime building, which can have drastic effects on retirement and
savings. Lastly, protecting Arizonans from a real estate sales or transfer
tax will allow homeowners to continue to transfer ownership of their
home or property into a legal trust or to another family member without
being penalized with a tax. Vote YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative
to keep fairness in Arizona's tax policies and help keep our community
strong.
|
Arthur Crozier,
ABR, CRS, GRI, Pinetop
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a school board member
I know the financial limits teacher's face in our inflationary economy.
Many teachers, and others, will find it difficult to ever afford a
home if what amounts to a sales tax is put on home sales. A tax on
the American dream is just wrong. A "YES" vote will prevent
this tax from being imposed on the people of Arizona. Stop the growth
of taxes, fees, and charges. Vote "YES" to Protect Our Homes!
|
Kimberly
Owens, Avondale
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
As a teacher, I am voting
YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative to guard our education system
by protecting teachers, students and Arizonan families from a real
estate sales or transfer tax. A real estate sales or transfer tax would
greatly affect affordable housing opportunities in our communities,
making it harder to attract the best quality teachers to come live
and work in Arizona. Additionally, our education system already suffers
from insufficient funding. In fact, Arizona is currently ranked 49
out of 50 states in funding per student. Since money for public schools
comes, in large part, from property taxes, the extreme underfunding
of our schools is a result of the lagging economy and more importantly
the slow real estate market. Imposing a real estate sales or transfer
tax in Arizona ensures that an even smaller number of people will be
able to afford to purchase new homes, and therefore decreases the total
amount of sales in the real estate market. Such a tax could have a
dramatic affect on the amount of money the Arizona public school system
receives. I support Arizona's public education system and that's why
I support the Protect Our Homes Initiative.
|
Nicholas
Lodato, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
I am voting YES on the
Protect Our Homes Initiative to protect my home and yours from a real
estate transfer tax. A home is often the biggest and most important
asset a person has in their lifetime - and it runs synonymous with
the American Dream. A real estate transfer tax would be a dangerous
threat to that dream. Because we already pay multiple taxes and fees
on our homes, a real estate transfer tax would further burden us by
adding on one more significant cost we will have to pay at closing-
it is double taxation! In this depressed economy, the double taxation
of Arizona's citizens would make it even harder for people and families
to buy and sell their homes by increasing costs. Families should be
afforded the opportunity to own a home and build equity in their homes
- to invest in their American dream - rather than forcing them to hand
over their hard work to government and give up on that dream.
|
Carla R.
Bowen, Pinetop
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
I am Voting YES on proposition
100, the Protect Our Homes Initiative, to say no to a real estate sales
or transfer tax in Arizona to ensure that we have affordable housing
for those living on a low or fixed income. Protecting Arizonans from
the harmful effects of a real estate sales or transfer tax will shield
the most vulnerable members of our community. In our current economy,
this is not the time to add burdens to those already struggling to
survive. According to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, Arizona's
average per person income grew by the smallest percentage in the United
States in 2007. Further, according to the Department of Commerce, Arizona
lost 26,000 manufacturing jobs and 23,700 construction-related jobs
in the 12 months through February 2008. These statistics do not paint
a pretty picture. As a community and as a state, we need to ensure
that we are doing everything possible to help lower income Arizonans
succeed - including keeping housing affordable. By increasing housing
costs, a real estate sales or transfer tax would disproportionally
affect lower income Arizonans and make it next to impossible for them
to own a first home or buy or sell a home in this harsh market. That
is not something I am willing to accept and that is why I am voting
YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative.
|
Jose Rivero,
Peoria
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
I am voting YES on the
Protect Our Homes Initiative in order to ban real estate transfer taxes
in Arizona. While we currently do not have a real estate transfer tax
it is important to be
proactive to stop such
a tax before it starts.
With the national real estate tax average
ranging from .1% to 2.2% of closing costs, a real estate transfer tax
in Arizona could add anywhere from $1,000-$20,000 on to the closing
costs of your home! In this slow market a real estate transfer tax
would prohibit many first-time homebuyers, families, and those on a
fixed income from buying a home. This hurts both sellers AND buyers
and is bad for Arizona.
|
Melissa L.
Clayton, Sierra Vista
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
I am voting YES on the
Protect Our Homes Initiative because the last thing we need in Arizona
is an additional tax burden. The Protect Our Homes Initiative will
protect Arizonans from a real estate transfer tax - a tax that would
be collected when you buy, sell or transfer ownership of your home,
land or commercial real estate. Our economy is burdened enough; adding
another tax on homeowners - especially when we already pay multiple
taxes and fees on our homes is irresponsible and will have a devastating
affect on the Arizona community and economy. According to the US Bureau
of Economic Analysis, Arizona's average per person income grew by the
smallest percentage in the US in 2007. Further, according to the Department
of Commerce, Arizona lost 26,000 manufacturing jobs and 23,700 construction-related
jobs in the 12 months through February according to the Department
of Commerce. This is not an economy that needs an additional tax that
would make it harder to buy or sell your home. Rather, we should be
making it easier for families, first time homebuyers, and those with
lower incomes to achieve homeownership and build equity by ensuring
that they will never have to fact the burden of a real estate transfer
tax.
|
Robert Zazueta,
Sierra Vista
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
I am voting YES on the
Protect Our Homes Initiative to ensure that everyone in Arizona - from
families, to first time homebuyers, to seniors are able to afford and
build equity in their homes and property. A real estate transfer tax
is collected when you sell or transfer ownership of your home, land
or commercial real estate. By banning real estate transfer taxes, we
protect Arizonans against its harmful effects and making it possible
for everyone to enjoy the benefits of homeownership. In the already
slowing market, a real estate transfer tax would make it more difficult
to buy or sell homes or property by increasing the costs to those buying
and selling homes or property. A real estate transfer tax will make
our already costly homes even more expensive. It will affect individuals
living on a fixed or low income the most as higher closing costs effectively
price many people out of the housing market.
|
Margie O'Campo
Castillo, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on Protect Our
Homes is crucial to prevent the double taxation of our home, land and/or
commercial real estate through real estate transfer taxes. Taxing our
home sales would be excessive and unfair. The fact is that all home
and properties are already aggressively taxed through annual property
taxes. Placing an additional tax at the time of sale or transfer means
that homebuyers or sellers are taxed a second time. This unfair real
estate transfer tax is an additional tax that will cut into your retirement
pension and savings, and damage the equity you spent a lifetime building.
With homeowners' equity at a 50-year low, according to the latest Federal
Reserve Bank report, a real estate transfer tax is the last thing Arizonans
need. This is why, I am voting YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative
to end real estate transfer taxes before they start and I urge you
to do the same.
|
Cliff Potts,
Payson
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative is essential in protecting Arizona families and
home owners. Under the current economy, the foreclosure rates in the
Arizona are among the highest in the nation, contributing to a hurting
economy. The real estate transfer tax in most states is exempt during
foreclosure. Since Arizona has such a high foreclosure rate, the state
would not bring in additional revenue from homes foreclosed upon, thereby
imposing a penalty tax to law abiding citizens that paid mortgages
for selling their homes. The real estate transfer tax unfairly imposes
a burden upon citizens in Arizona because in the current economy, the
majority of property transfers in the state are due to foreclosure
and not a typical sale.
|
Susan L.
Abdallah, Casa Grande
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative is imperative to protecting Arizona from real
estate transfer taxes. Because a real estate transfer tax is collected
at closing, it would place a detrimental burden on the lower income
that typically spends a larger percentage of their income on their
home. Under the slow economy and bad housing market, lenders have labeled
much of Maricopa County as a "declining market", meaning
buyers must put down an additional 5% to their down payment in cash.
It will not be long before this trend spread and affects the rest of
Arizona. Coming up with several tens of thousands of dollars for a
down payment is not feasible for many people, especially since most
have little or no equity in their current homes. Adding on an extra
closing cost through a real estate transfer tax, prices out many young
families and potential first time homeowners from the housing market.
With a significant decrease in the number of first time buyers, the
demand for home buying will decrease in already ailing market, ensuring
that the Arizona economy will further plummet.
|
Gary T. Best,
Tucson
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative protects your constitutional right to maintain
your property. The real estate transfer tax destroys your property
rights. As a homeowner, you paid your property taxes and paid the value
of your home, thereby making your home your property as protected by
the United States Constitution. Under your fundamental property right,
you possess the rights to use or sell your home as you choose. The
real estate transfer tax gives your property rights to the Government
to make more money off of your property and assets, making you pay
the bill. That is why I support the Protect Our Homes Initiative.
|
Delores Manwar,
Scottsdale
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative will protect you from the damaging effects of
a real estate transfer tax and will protect the equity you have worked
hard to build in your home. A real estate transfer tax is a state or
local government imposed tax this is collected when you sell or transfer
ownership of your home, land or commercial real estate - they would
even apply to the transfer of your home or property into a legal trust.
The additional tax on your home is double taxation! All homes and properties
are already taxed through annual property taxes. Whether you are a
first time homebuyer, a middle-income family, or a senior on a fixed
income, an additional tax at the time of sale or transfer, guarantees
homebuyers are taxed second time which is unfair and hurts everyone.
|
Holly Mabery,
Cornville
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative protects our senior citizens and their assets.
The real estate transfer tax will work to prohibit Arizona's seniors
from life-long commitments and trusts to transfer property to family
member. The real estate transfer tax imposes a penalty upon our seniors
and their families left behind by imposing a double tax on property
when transferred within the family. Our State's most valued and respected
citizens should not be penalized for their contributions to the state
by unfairly imposing a tax on their property remaining within the same
family ownership. I support Arizona's seniors and that's why I support
the Protect Our Homes Initiative.
|
Kenneth Motta,
Yuma
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Voting YES on the Protect
Our Homes Initiative will protect ALL Arizonans from the damaging effects
of a real estate transfer tax. A real estate transfer tax is collected
when you buy, sell or transfer your home, land or property. This additional
cost would be a great detriment to the Arizona economy as it would
further burden an already slow housing market and hurt Arizona's business.
Migration to Arizona from other states decline 34% last year. The Blue
Chip report attributed the decline in migration to Arizona and other
states to difficulty selling homes - something that would be further
damaged by a real estate transfer tax, which would add additional closing
costs. Further, according to Arizona State University's Realty Students
Department, valley-wide, sales of existing homes fell 24% last year
- the lowest level of activity since 1997. This is bad for families
and business. We must act now to do what we can to maintain home affordability
and help our families and businesses grow and flourish. That is why
I am doing my part by voting YES on the Protect Our Homes Initiative.
|
Tina Totty,
Rio Rico
|
|
Paid
for by "Protect Our Homes (AAR) In Support of C-18-2008"
|
Argument Against PROP 100
No New Home Tax
Arizona is facing a new reality,
one that includes fast-paced growth and a drastic need to expand infrastructure
for millions of new residents. The state of Arizona will grow to more
than 18 million, from its current population of 6 million, over the next
30 years. No New Home Tax, or PROP 100, is an attempt to tie the hands
of Arizona's elected officials as they determine the best way to grow
Arizona into the future.
It is clear that Arizona is
too reliant on taxes that do not produce consistent revenue in tough
economic times. The current down turn in the economy has caused the state
a $2.2 billion deficit, and Arizona does not have a viable solution.
PROP 100 will change the constitution of Arizona to
protect real estate corporations and developers. Changing our constitution
to protect wealthy special interests will cripple our state's ability
to support the needs of a growing state.
The Arizona Education Association
opposes this initiative because it will have long-term damaging effects
on public education. A vote in opposition is a step toward a stronger
economy and high-quality services, including great public schools and
universities, quality transportation, and health care needed in the 21st
century knowledge-based economy, and funded by a sound and equitable
system of taxation. Support means that we fall farther behind our development
goals, dragged down by deteriorating services and poor amenities funded
by a revenue system that is characterized by inequitable taxes and structural
deficits extending far into the future. The Arizona Education Association
requests that you vote NO on PROP 100.
|
John Wright,
President, Arizona Education Association, Phoenix
|
Andrew Morrill,
Vice-President, Arizona Education Association, Phoenix
|
|
Paid
for by "Arizona Education Association"
|
ARGUMENT AGAINST C-18-2008 :
Vote NO!
At the State of Arizona
level, there is no such tax-revenue source, and any new tax-revenue
source requires a super-majority of two-thirds vote by each Arizona
legislative house and the Governor's signature. If the Governor vetoes
any new tax-revenue bill, then the Legislature must muster a three-quarters
vote in each Arizona legislative house to override the veto to enact
the new tax-revenue law.
At the County-City-Local
levels, which are the closest form of representative government that
we have, these local representatives should not have their hands tied
if future conditions require that all sources of revenue are available.
Local officials feel the heat of being ousted from office when they
infuriate the voters.
This proposal says, "Let's
bind society's hands more, and put off-limits a potential revenue quill
in our social contract quiver. Even if desperately needed, we will
keep it off-limits."
Vote NO!
In the 1970's, the State
of Arizona revenue sources were relatively diversified with about 30%
sales taxes, 30% income taxes, 30% federal transfer funds, and about
10% from everything else. Because of tax cuts for businesses and the
wealthy during the 1990s through today, Arizona's revenues are non-diversified:
50% sales tax, 30% income tax, and 20% federal transfers
Why are Arizona's revenue
finances in horrible shape? We are dependent on the cyclical sales
tax. Arizona's social contract with its citizens can only be carried
out by its representatives when government has a variety of tax sources
and responsible spending.
This proposal stomps on
social equity and social justice by shifting the cost of government
from businesses and the wealthy to middle and low income citizens.
We should all shoulder our share!
Vote NO!
|
Bradley K.
Vandermark,Phoenix
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION
BY THE
INITIATIVE RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY
|
|
PROPOSING
AN AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE IX OF THE ARIZONA CONSTITUTION BY ADDING
A NEW SECTION 24 RELATING TO A PROHIBITION OF ANY NEW REAL PROPERTY
SALE OR TRANSFER TAX IN ARIZONA.
|
|
PROHIBITS
STATE, COUNTY, CITY, TOWN, MUNICIPAL OR OTHER STATE POLITICAL SUBDIVISION
FROM IMPOSING ANY NEW TAX, FEE, OR OTHER ASSESSMENT ON THE SALE,
PURCHASE, TRANSFER, OR OTHER CONVEYANCE OF ANY INTEREST IN REAL ESTATE
AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote
shall have the effect of prohibiting any new tax, fee, or other assessment
on the sale, purchase or other conveyance of real estate after December
31, 2007.
|
YES
|
|
A "no" vote
shall have the effect of retaining the current law, which allows
taxes on the sale or transfer of real estate.
|
NO
|
The Ballot Format displayed in
HTML reflects only the text of the Ballot Proposition and does not
reflect how it will appear on the General Election Ballot.
Spelling, grammar, and punctuation were reproduced as submitted in the "for" and "against" arguments.
JANICE
K. BREWER
Arizona Secretary of State
|
|
© September
2008
|
|